What Is The True Meaning Of Being A Man In The 21st Century?

selective focus photography of man
Share

Consider two men. First, there’s Ted Bundy, a notoriously charismatic and dangerous American serial killer. He was executed in 1989 for the rape and murder of over 30 women. Then, there’s Thomas Edison. He was a simple, skinny boy who was partially deaf and often lost in his own thoughts, yet he ultimately changed the world with his inventions. Between these two, which one do we immediately see as the “real alpha male”?

If we are being honest, most of us would probably point to the notorious criminal. Bundy was handsome, confident, and manipulative. He possessed a dark charm that society, in its most twisted interpretation, often mistakes for strength. Edison, by contrast, was unassuming, intellectually focused, and physically unimposing.

It’s completely understandable if you chose wrong. For centuries, society has conditioned us to view men through a narrow, suffocating lens. We picture them with broad shoulders, an imposing stature, and a fierce mustache. We imagine a man who is stoic, unshakeable, and emotionally impenetrable. But when someone asks a man, “How are you? Are you okay? You seem sad,” we simply laugh it off. “We’re men,” we say, “we toss such questions away as a joke.” This dismissal is not a sign of strength. It is a symptom of a deeply ingrained cultural mandate that equates emotional expression with weakness.

This societal “alpha male” has a heavy beard, a muscular body, and a deep voice. He’s the guy who effortlessly seduces women. He’s the hero of his community who stays fit despite a lifestyle of drinking and smoking. He lives a life of luxury and seems to have complete control over his world, his emotions, and everyone in it. He is, by society’s flawed definition, The Real Alpha Male.

Challenging the Definition

But this definition crumbles under the slightest scrutiny. If a dashing beard and a strong body are the true qualities of a real man, what about figures like Elon Musk? He revolutionized multiple industries with his intellect. Consider Mark Zuckerberg, who connected the world from a dorm room, or Bill Gates, the visionary who brought computing to the masses. What about Sachin Tendulkar? He was a man of average height who became a god in cricket through sheer discipline and talent, not brute force.

What if a traditionally aggressive and dominant personality is a prerequisite? What can we say about the profound contributions of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, a gentle scientist who became a beloved president? Or Mahatma Gandhi, a frail man in a loincloth who brought an empire to its knees with non-violence? Consider Sir Ratan Tata, a titan of industry known for his humility and philanthropy.

And if an attractive and bold nature is the very definition of a man, then what were men like Albert Einstein, with his famously disheveled hair and gentle eyes? What about Isaac Newton, a reclusive genius, or Swami Vivekananda, a spiritual leader who preached self-mastery? The Great Buddha found strength in renunciation, not acquisition.

The definition of a “real man” becomes even more complex when we examine cultures across history. Consider the honor-bound Japanese Samurai, the ethical codes of Chinese Confucianism, or the spiritual duties of Hinduism. Look at the philosophical ideals of the Greeks and the community-focused Egyptians. Each culture offers a varied perspective. The shocking truth is that no culture, book, or religion has taught us the ideal definition of a man. The only exception is one: The Unwritten Book of Society.

The Rise of Alpha Culture

This unwritten book has powerful and often damaging rules. According to modern surveys, its influence is clear:

  • 68% of men believe they should handle any task entirely on their own, viewing asking for help as a sign of failure.
  • 58% of men think they must be emotionally strong no matter what, believing the toxic saying, “mard ko dard nahi hota” (a man feels no pain).
  • 74% of men believe they must have six-pack abs to be attractive, linking their self-worth to their appearance.
  • When a man is asked, “What is your favorite part of the day?” a common answer is, “When I am in the gym.” This suggests the pursuit of physical perfection has become central to male identity.
  • And finally, a staggering 97% of men believe they can be Batman. This is a fantasy of a lone, tormented hero who solves problems with violence and intellect while hiding his true, vulnerable self.

This, my friends, is The Rise of the Alpha Culture.

As a man, I know firsthand the struggles we face from this societal pressure. That’s why this article is for every man. I’m not going to give you routines or quick-fix solutions. Instead, I’m going to discuss the factual reality of alpha males. Can a man achieve attraction, respect, and a fulfilling life only by being an “alpha”? Or does history—and science—tell a different story?

Where Did the “Alpha Male” Concept Come From?

For many people, especially in India, the term “alpha male” burst into the mainstream after Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s movie Animal. The film portrayed a hyper-aggressive, dominant protagonist. The public discourse that followed reignited a simplistic narrative: there were two types of men—the alphas and everyone else.

According to this story, alphas were the primordial leaders who hunted in the jungle. They were the strongest and most powerful. They would hunt mammoths and bring them home, where women would cook. Society, the story says, functioned this way from the dawn of time. Women instinctively chose the alpha to be their partner and protect them.

But here is the surprising, scientifically-backed truth. This thrilling, alpha-male-dominated story has no real source in human history or anthropology. It’s a modern myth pieced together from a misunderstanding of animal behavior. While researching the origin of the “alpha,” I stumbled upon a name that had nothing to do with humans: The Alpha Wolf. 🐺

The year was 1947. A researcher named Rudolf Schenkel published a paper called Expression Studies on Wolves. He wrote that he had observed captive wolves and noticed a distinct social hierarchy. A single, powerful wolf couple led the pack. These leaders weren’t chosen democratically. They had to brutally fight other wolves until the loser submitted. Schenkel labeled the victorious pair the Alpha Wolves. This was the first time the term “alpha” was used in this biological context.

The term wasn’t very popular at first. But about 23 years later, in 1970, an American biologist, Dr. L. David Mech, published a book that would change everything: The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species. In it, he heavily referenced and explained Schenkel’s study. He defined the “alpha wolf” in stark, compelling terms. He described it as an aggressive, dominating, and confident animal that leads others through force and intimidation.

At that moment, David Mech had no idea he was making a monumental mistake. It was a mistake he would spend the rest of his career trying to correct.

The concept became an overnight sensation. The book was a bestseller, and the idea of the “alpha” was too compelling to remain in biology. As the philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti stated, “the description is not the described.” This means that as a concept is repeated, its original meaning becomes distorted. This is precisely what happened with the term “alpha male.”

The word spread from science books to Hollywood screens. The film industry took this flawed concept and ran with it. They began associating the “alpha male” with a specific and often toxic image:

  • A charming man who keeps women under his control.
  • A leader who is dominating and aggressive.
  • His confidence becomes arrogance.
  • His intelligence becomes a condescending attitude.
  • His physical strength is converted into a lust for power.
  • His leadership turns into outright dominance.

Think of characters like Gordon Gekko in Wall Street or Tony Montana in Scarface. They were powerful lone wolves who took what they wanted. This fictional ideal became a blueprint for millions of men. The real problem began when this blueprint was used to create a rigid classification system for male “personalities.”

The 7 Male Archetypes: Do They Exist?

Let’s imagine we’re at a large house party. According to a popular online theory, the 700 million men in India can be divided into seven personality types. We’d likely find all of them at this party. This system is popular in online forums and social media, creating a vocabulary for men to define themselves.

But do these categories hold any real psychological weight? Let’s examine them.

ArchetypeCore IdentityKey Characteristics
Alpha MaleThe Dominant LeaderAggressive, confident, charismatic, controlling.
Beta MaleThe Supportive CollaboratorKind, selfless, reliable, respectful.
Gamma MaleThe Adventurous CreatorFun-loving, exciting, creative, empathetic.
Omega MaleThe Skilled IntrovertSelf-sufficient, intelligent, introspective.
Zeta MaleThe Independent RebelNon-conformist, challenges norms, independent.
Delta MaleThe Responsible EverymanHardworking, responsible, calm, stable.
Sigma MaleThe Lone WolfIntroverted leader, self-reliant, mysterious.

Let’s break them down further:

  • Alpha Male: He’s making the most noise at the party, holding court in the center of the room. He is aggressive and in complete control. For him, apologizing is an insult. He’s an intimidating presence.
  • Beta Male: He’s the opposite of the Alpha. You’ll find him in the kitchen helping the host or including a quiet guest. He is kind and selfless. He prioritizes relationships over his own ego.
  • Gamma Male: He’s the one telling a hilarious story. He’s a fun-loving and exciting person. He brings energy and life to any social gathering.
  • Omega Male: You might not notice him at first. He stands in the corner, observing with quiet intensity. He is a skilled introvert, a deep thinker with a rich internal life.
  • Zeta Male: He’s the one questioning why the party is even happening. He is a non-conformist who challenges society’s rules. He carves out his own path entirely.
  • Delta Male: He arrived on time and will leave at a reasonable hour for work. He is the “normal” man in society—responsible, calm, and hardworking. He is the backbone of society.
  • Sigma Male: He arrived alone and keeps to himself, yet everyone knows who he is. He is the “lone wolf” of modern society. He has the confidence of an Alpha but operates outside the social hierarchy.

By now, you’ve probably categorized yourself or your friends. You might have even wished you were one of these types.

But what if I told you that none of these types actually exist?

VIBEMOTIVE

This framework may be a fun way to describe personalities, but it has no basis in scientific psychology. It’s a rigid system that forces the infinite complexity of human personality into seven small boxes. This, my friend, is The Masculinity Paradox. Men are constantly told to be a “real man,” but no one tells them how without using these fake, limiting labels.

Why the Alpha Male Is a Myth: The Real Wolf Story

Remember the biologist David Mech? By the 1990s, he knew he had to correct his mistake. The “alpha wolf” concept was not just wrong; it was the complete opposite of the truth.

To fix his error, he embarked on deep, immersive research. He spent 24 summers with the National Geographic team observing wild wolf packs on Ellesmere Island, Canada. This was the wolves’ natural habitat, not a zoo. He discovered a profound truth. The behavior he saw was nothing like the aggressive hierarchy described in the original studies.

He realized wild wolves were not aggressive. They didn’t constantly attack each other for dominance. Instead, they were highly social, cooperative, and friendly. The packs weren’t random groups of competing individuals; they were families.

The so-called “alpha pair” were simply the parents. The other wolves were their offspring. The “alphas” led the pack through natural authority and experience, not violence. They cared for the young, guided hunts, and maintained harmony.

This discovery led him to re-investigate Schenkel’s old study. He finally found the source of the error. The wolves in the first study were not a natural pack. They were unrelated wolves captured from different places and confined in small zoo cages. Their aggressive behavior was a reaction to a stressful, unnatural environment with strangers.

After this discovery, David Mech published a new paper in 1999, publicly admitting his mistake. He wrote that the term “alpha wolf” was outdated and inaccurate. He stated that the true nature of a wolf pack is a family unit based on cooperation. He even tried to stop the printing of his own bestselling book to prevent the misinformation from spreading.

But it was too late. The world had already taken his mistake and created new dimensions for the fake alpha concept. The myth had become a fundamental truth in pop culture. It created a set of deeply harmful stereotypes for men:

  • A man’s anger turns him into a destructive monster.
  • A man feels pain but acts like it doesn’t bother him.
  • A man controls women, whether in a relationship or not.
  • A man who is sad doesn’t cry but becomes “stronger.”
  • A man’s value depends on his money and status.

Men’s and women’s bodies are different. But it’s wrong to say that a man’s emotional side is a negative trait. The truth is that both men and women have the same neurochemicals and emotional parts in their brains. Society simply conditions us to use them differently.

This conditioning is relentless.

  • A six-year-old boy falls, and we tell him, “Boys don’t cry.”
  • A boy at school gets frustrated, and he’s told, “If you shed a tear, you are a girl.”
  • As he grows, he hears, “You should be responsible for the house.”

These thousands of sayings create a supposedly “strong” heart in a man. His life becomes a narrow checklist: a good career, a big house, an expensive car, and lots of money. He learns to share his laughter, jokes, and anger. But he never shares his sadness, fear, or uncertainty. He might have friends and a partner, yet he often has a difficult, emotionally distant relationship with his father, who was taught the same toxic rules. He is silently and mentally tormented by his own thoughts.

This is a public health crisis. The American Psychological Association (APA) has found a link between traditional masculinity and mental health issues. Men who rigidly adhere to traits like risk-taking, violence, and dominance are more likely to suffer. This includes having an “always winning” mentality and craving social status. These men face a higher risk of depression, anxiety, stress, and substance abuse.

This may be why, according to the World Health Organization, nearly 80% of global suicides are committed by men. This rate is, in some countries, four times higher than for women. A large percentage of these men once tried their hardest to follow these toxic masculine traits.

So, if this is all fake masculinity, then what is real, ideal masculinity? Who is the man today who is completely happy, satisfied, and a fulfilling presence to others?

Being a Man in the 21st Century

5 Traits of Positive Masculinity

The world has over 10,000 religions and countless cultures. Almost every one has a unique definition of an ideal man. The modern “alpha male” trope is a recent and shallow addition to this rich tapestry.

  • The ancient Greeks believed in a “Great Souled Man” who demonstrated excellence in all aspects of life.
  • The ancient Egyptians saw an “ideal” man as one who served his community with justice and truth.
  • Japanese Samurai culture valued a man with honor, courage, compassion, and loyalty.
  • Chinese Confucianism prized an ideal man with deep moral ethics and social responsibility.
  • In Hinduism, we find the great names of Purushottam Ram (the ideal man) and Shri Krishna.
  • Buddhists believe a perfect man is free from ego and brings peace through inner calmness.

The definition of an ideal man has changed over time. In today’s modern era, the real definition is a concept called Positive Masculinity. It’s a modern framework supported by psychologists and the APA. It works with the new generation instead of chaining them to old, restrictive ideas.

Mental health organizations have created a practical framework for positive masculinity. It includes five core character traits. These are not archetypes; they are skills any man can develop.

1. Emotional Intelligence (EQ)

We’ve all heard of IQ, but we rarely pay attention to EQ, our Emotional Quotient. EQ is the ability to recognize, understand, and manage your own emotions. It’s also the ability to recognize and influence the emotions of others.

Research consistently shows our success depends 80% on our EQ and only 20% on our IQ. Why? Because our emotions heavily influence 90% of our major life decisions. This includes who we marry, what career we choose, and how we handle a crisis. When a man suppresses his emotions, his emotional intelligence becomes weak. He becomes a stranger to his own inner world.

2. Connective Behavior

The Harvard Study of Adult Development is the longest-running study on human happiness. Spanning over 80 years, it found one key predictor of a long, happy life: healthy social connections. These connections are more important than money, fame, or career success. They give us a sense of satisfaction and belonging.

You can only create a better connection when you can express yourself authentically. Surprisingly, an estimated 60% of men are never able to express their deeper feelings properly. This is because traditional masculinity teaches that sharing emotional problems is a sign of weakness. The truth is the exact opposite. Vulnerability is the foundation of genuine connection.

3. Cognitive Flexibility

The martial artist Bruce Lee had a famous philosophy: “Be water, my friend.” Water takes the shape of its container. It can flow or it can crash. Traditional masculinity demands rigidity. It tells you to see situations in black and white.

Cognitive flexibility is the ability to mold your thinking to the situation. It means seeing things from multiple points of view and learning from your mistakes. Any great leader or entrepreneur reached their position because they changed with the times and adapted.

4. Humor Without Harm

In today’s online culture, “humor” has often become a weapon. It’s used to make people laugh by putting someone else down. But in positive masculinity, humor is a tool for connection. It’s used to create bonds and lighten difficult situations.

When humor is used to hurt someone, it is a sign of deep insecurity. Real confidence doesn’t require you to bring someone else down to lift yourself up. Positive humor is inclusive and kind.

5. Genuine Self-Worth

Traditional masculinity tells you to demonstrate your value through external markers like an expensive car or a muscular body. This is external validation. It’s fragile because it can be taken away at any moment.

Genuine self-worth, however, is internal. It comes from being comfortable with who you are and accepting yourself, flaws and all. It comes from knowing your strengths and working on your weaknesses. A man with genuine self-worth doesn’t need to prove he is a “real man.” He is too busy simply being a good one. His confidence is quiet, steady, and unbreakable because it comes from within.

REALITY OF TRUE ALPHA

When these traits become part of your personality, you will see what actual peace and satisfaction feel like. The journey begins by rejecting the fake, harmful definitions of masculinity.

In the end, we must return to our opening question. Who was the real alpha? Ted Bundy, the monster who destroyed lives? Or Thomas Edison, the inventor who illuminated the world?

The answer is clear.

A real alpha is not one who dominates others. A real alpha is one who masters himself, his emotions, and his life.

This journey of self-mastery begins by embracing what it means to be a human being. It means being strong enough to be gentle, confident enough to be humble, and man enough to be vulnerable. That is the surprising and liberating truth.

TOPIC YOU MAY LIKE

  • September 24, 2025